Realms of Candarion

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Unread
    • Recent
    • Users
    • Charter
    • Wiki
    • Date Calculator
    • Map

    Changing Viscount Requirements

    Closed Discussions
    6
    7
    49
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bryson3842
      bryson3842 Minister last edited by

      Specifically, this would add 10 builds to the build requirements for Viscount to even out the progression. The current difference between what is currently Knight and Baron is 20 builds. The difference between Baron and Viscount is 20 Builds. The difference between Viscount and Count is 65 builds. The difference between Count and Duke is 60 builds. This does not make sense to me and I would like to see the total build number for Viscount be 65, with additional builds column rising to 40 to make up for the addition in the total. This would change no other aspect besides these two numbers.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TheValeyard
        TheValeyard Baron last edited by

        On the face of it I see no problem with this . Outside of reducing Count requirements, this is the only way to even it up

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Tioteche
          Tioteche Baron last edited by

          I dont see the need for an equal/gradual progression. The current system's build counts are working fine. So it's easier to get from Baron > Viscount and harder to get from Viscount > Count, what's the problem here? We have little enough people becoming Viscounts as it is, let alone Counts.

          bryson3842 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bryson3842
            bryson3842 Minister @Tioteche last edited by

            @Tioteche It is harder to get from viscount to count than from count to duke is my main problem

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Alric
              Alric Count last edited by

              I see no need to change it and make it harder when only 4 people have gotten the rank.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • ?
                A Former User last edited by

                This just feels OCD to me. Not everything needs to be the same, or incremental. It is the way it is and isn't creating any problems.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L
                  LawnBoy072 Baron last edited by

                  I see no issue with this - people will argue 'What is 10 builds? What does that even mean?' but that argument flows equally both ways. Even pacing is a fine enough reason to bump some numbers up or others down.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post

                  3
                  Online

                  301
                  Users

                  1.5k
                  Topics

                  6.7k
                  Posts